If you were logged in you would gain 3 XP for posting a reply.
You are replying to:
For example one could have three choices: -1, 0, +1. You see, right now the label is either assigned to the map (0) or not (1). All maps which have the same label assigned fall into one category. With a labels voting system you would have a continous scale from 0 to 1 which displays *certanity* whether the map is falling into the category or not. The formula computing the certanity value might be ( ((<number of positive votes> - <number of negative votes>) / (2 * <total votes>)) + 0.5 ) and 0.5 if noone has adjusted the label to the map yet. The search engine should show only *positive* certanity results (when the certanity value is strictly greater than 0.5).
"I bet at this stage we could code a better Starcraft engine from scratch ourselves. :P" - Tuxlar
For example one could have three choices: -1, 0, +1. You see, right now the label is either assigned to the map (0) or not (1). All maps which have the same label assigned fall into one category. With a labels voting system you would have a continous scale from 0 to 1 which displays *certanity* whether the map is falling into the category or not. The formula computing the certanity value might be ( ((<number of positive votes> - <number of negative votes>) / (2 * <total votes>)) + 0.5 ) and 0.5 if noone has adjusted the label to the map yet. The search engine should show only *positive* certanity results (when the certanity value is strictly greater than 0.5).