It's getting rather unwieldy. What's better is a sorted list of ideas with up/down votes. Kind of like this: http://kdice.com/ideas . Done/rejected ideas get tossed from the list.
dokebithis is unnecessary. they're all good ideas.
When you create software that's widely used, bug/feature prioritization is almost a necessity, especially when you don't have time to do everything on that list.
It's getting rather unwieldy. What's better is a sorted list of ideas with up/down votes. Kind of like this: http://kdice.com/ideas . Done/rejected ideas get tossed from the list.
Or we just make separate threads under categories, "Forums" "Maps" "Media" "User issues" "Ranks/Levels/Prices" etc.
Possible. Though that still doesn't quickly identify which are the best or most popular ideas (which should be higher priority).
this is unnecessary. they're all good ideas.
When you create software that's widely used, bug/feature prioritization is almost a necessity, especially when you don't have time to do everything on that list.
True, but it's not like dcramer can read EVERY suggestion and comment on them, hes very busy just working on the site to begin with.
Ya I pretty much just prioritize things that "bug me". I tend to redo things over and over til I feel they're right (like design bits).
I do try to look over any website-related threads though.