Post Reply

If you were logged in you would gain 3 XP for posting a reply.

Please respect our terms of use when participating in Nibbits.

Preview
Comment
We will show a masked version of your IP address as well as your name.

You are replying to:

  • Frozen Wolf: Natural disasters are not solid scientific evidence for global warming. Do you think these things did not happen long before industrialization had taken place? Archaeologists will tell you that thousands of years ago (how many is debatable) North America was completely frozen over. Natural climate change occurred, as many others have already commented on. Do you believe that the people living in North America before the existence of automobiles or the common knowledge of production of fire caused global warming? If so, what would you propose their devices of malice were. If not, then should the melting of an entire ice blanket over an entire continent not being constituted as global warming completely nullify the claims that temperature change of a few degrees is going to be the end of humanity? I believe that it should. This is more of a pontification, as someone before me commented on ice ages.

    This is not to say that man does not adversely affect the environment. Being conscious of how humans are affecting the things we survive off of is a valuable trait.

    Private
    avatar

Support Nibbits by linking to us: